Tucson Rifle Club, Inc.

HC 2 Box 7128

Tucson, AZ 85735-9729

Newsletter Tucson Rifle Club – June & July 2003

MONTHLY MATCH SCHEDULES:

1st Saturday - Blackpowder Cartridge Rifle Silhouette 9AM and Tucson Action Shooters

1st Sunday – NRA Hi-Power Rifle Silhouette 9:30 AM and The Old Pueblo Cowboy Single Action 9AM

2nd Saturday – 1000yd.NBRSA (Light & Heavy) 7AM and Tactical Multi-gun Night Shoot (1600 hrs).

2nd Sunday - 1000yd Saguaro Benchrest 7AM; Southern Arizona Wildlife Callers (SAWC) Prairie Dog Silhouette (*) or balloon shoot, 9AM.

3rd Saturday - TASC

3rd Sunday – CMP John C Garrand Match (7AM); NRA Small-Bore Rifle Silhouette (10AM); The Altar Valley Pistoleros Cowboy Single Action (9AM); and Old Pueblo Muzzle Loaders (OPML) [see John, I finally fixed your announcement.]

4th Saturday - High Power Rifle-NMC (80 round) & The President's Practical Tactical Multi-Gun Action Match (afternoon ~1300 winter & 1500 summer)

4th Sunday - IHMSA Small-Bore Pistol Silhouette AND Big-Bore w/Field Pistol on the same day at 9AM

(*) “Even” months only e.g. February, April, June, August, October, etc.

Anything on a 5th Weekend are usually special events so do the smart thing CALL THE RANGE to find out what is going on if you THINK you are going to have a certain range ALL to yourself. 

·         RANGE HOURS  7:00 AM to 5:00 PM

Call the Range 822-5189 for information & conformation of match dates and times.

Note:  Monthly meetings are held in different locations.  

On the Odd Months the meeting will be held at Diamondback Police Supplies, 170 S Kolb Rd  (meeting room) beginning at 6 PM

 (1800 hrs) on the Third Wednesday’s. 

On the Even Months the meetings will be held at The TIA Executive Terminal 3rd Wednesday’s also beginning at 6 PM

www.tucsonrifleclub.org

§       I urge you to join the NRA & GOA for national representation and join Brassroots and FACT for State & local government activities and stay alert to (and help influence) the politics that surround us.

§         The Four Basic Rules of Firearms Safety

1.       Always handle firearms as if they are loaded and ready to fire.

2.      Always point the muzzle in a safe direction.

(“Safe” means at something you are willing to destroy OR at something, that can effectively stop the round)

3.      Always keep your finger straight along the frame until you are on target and ready to fire.

4.       Always be sure your target and what's behind it are safe to shoot.  (know where your bullets are going to stop)

§         The Four Rules of Firearms Etiquette

(Rules for handling guns in the presence of other persons)

1.        Never accept OR hand a weapon to anyone unless the action is open.

2.        Never place a weapon anywhere unless the action is open & unloaded.

3.        Never let the muzzle of any weapon that you control cross anyone's body.

4.       Whenever you handle a weapon that has been out of your control, verify the condition of the weapon immediately—action is open & unloaded.

REMINDER – Tucson Rifle Club requires range users to USE an OPEN BOLT INDICATOR (OBI) and they SHALL be installed in every firearm ON the Firing Line of every range during a CEASEFIRE.

Firearm Philosophical Warning –

Once the bullet leaves the barrel, it has no friends.

Upcoming Events:

§         TRC members – There is an effort afoot to eliminate the need to publish and mail (a significant cost) the newsletter.  To this end, our stupendous webmaster has generated a special feature at the TRC website that will allow you to “automagically” have the NL emailed to your email address.  Go to:

http://www.tucsonrifleclub.org/TRC_newsletter_subscribe.shtml

and this URL will instruct you on how to perform this miracle of modern communications.  This is a good idea because as time goes on more TRC members are becoming internet users and you begin to enjoy the advantages of email and the net.

Junior Program activities: We had eight kids attending the shooting instruction and practice sessions at the Range.  We have a varied selection of rifles some with modified stocks to fit the diminutive stature of the younger shooters.  The group meets on the Second Saturday’s and the Forth Sunday’s of the month.  We have a few shooting coats and two spotting scopes for the shooting sessions.

We start with a safety and rifle system class that the kids attend before their introduction to the range and shooting activities.   Learning (the latest method) the MAT checklist of rifle safety:  M – MUZZLE;           A – ACTION;          T – TRIGGER

We are always looking for equipment donations and if anyone has an extra scope, shooting mat or glove the Junior Program would put them to good use.  Just get it to the Range Office and we’ll add it to our collection.

If your kids (ages 10 to 18) are interested in participating in the Junior Program, contact the Range and leave your name and how you can be contacted.  May Warren is the communication coordinator and contacts families on our list of participants when we have to deviate from the present schedule.  Vacations and/or attending the Nationals at Camp Perry (Port Clinton, OH) or Raton, NM will sometimes cause cancellations or rescheduling of our Junior range activities.

(And we’re dedicated to getting the Junior shooters to these matches when they are ready.)

CALL THE RANGE OFFICE @ 822-5189 for any immediate updates or information that you’ll need to get coordinated with the Junior Program.

MATCH RESULTS:

2003 Arizona State High Power Silhouette Rifle Championships   

     Tucson Rifle Club was the host for State High Power Silhouette Rifle Championships held on May 17 and 18, 2003.  Temperatures in the high 90s and low 100s were complimented by high wind and the infamous Tucson Dust Devils which danced across the range obscuring targets and knocking over targets! 

Shooters from surrounding states including: Nebraska, Colorado, California, New Mexico, Mexico and Texas stood up in this all offhand event and engaged steel targets out to 500 meters!  Standard rifle champion, Jose Rodriguez of El Paso, Texas distinguished himself by shooting a 62 of possible 80.  Chandler resident, Jim Beckley shot his way to Hunting Rifle Champion with a score of 53 of 80.

     Eighty rifles were fielded by fifty five competitors in this two day event.  A bar BBQ dinner was served Saturday night.  Some two dozen door prizes were awarded to lucky competitors including a new Ruger rifle, Oehler chronographs, Sierra bullets, Shilen barrel and many others.

     Tucson Rifle Club moved to its present location in the mid-sixties and is known for hosting the first National High Power Silhouette Rifle Championships in 1968.

Match highlights follow

STANDARD RIFLE

High AZ Resident - Jim Feren, Bullhead City 53x80

2nd Place State Champ Tony Tello, Riverside, CA        53x80

3rd Place State Champ Jim Beckley, Chandler, AZ         53x80

High Master Jim Feren                        53x80

High SR Jerry Patton, Bellevue, NE 41x80

High Int Jr Justin Patton, Bellevue, NE            48x80

High Woman Joy Cox         47x80

1st AAA Justin Patton       48x80

1st AA Gabriel Reyes, El Paso TX    44x80

1st A  Tim Faras Tucson, AZ            26x80

1st B Art Bernal Jr, Douglas, AZ       30x80

HUNTING RIFLE

High AZ Resident - Jim Beckley, Chandler                 53x80

2nd Place State Champ Jose Rodriguez, El Paso, TX 51x80         

3rd Place State Champ Jerry Patton, Bellevue, NE 49x80

High Sr   Jerry Patton, Bellevue, NE                  49x80

High Jr   Robert Moreno, Nogales, AZ            18x80

High Int Jr  Justin Patton, Bellevue, NE           38x80

High Woman  Joy Cox, Phoenix                        45x80

1st Master Jeff Boyer, Globe, AZ                      41x80

1st AAA Ed Pfeiffer,                                           49x80

1st AA   Robert Herrera, La Mirada, CA          38x80

1st A      Filiberto Portillo, El Paso, TX             33x80

1st B       Hugo Ledesma, Los Angles, CA       20x80

 

1000 Yard Prone Match 6-1-03

 

 

Name

Match 1

Match 2

Agg.

%

Allan Elliott

198.005

195.006

393.011

 0.983

Justin Skaret

192.008

198.010

390.018

0.975

Bob Jones

194.003

186.004

380.007

0.950

Rick Smart

173.001

171.002

344.003

0.860

Jim D

169.003

167.003

336.006

0.840

Greg Fallon

189.004

195.003

384.007

0.960

High Power Rifle Silhouette June 1, 2003

Cls/Pls

Name

Score

AAA/MW

Ron A Calderone

29

AA

May Warren

11

AA

Nic Moreno

18

AA/1st

Andres Wirchaga

20

A

Vince Lazara

13

A

Milt Hood

10

A

Mike Chapdelain

18

A/1st

Tim Faras

21

B/1st

Ruben Reyes

9

It’s hot out there! But 9 brave shooters competed with light wind conditions. Congrats to Nogales shooter Andres Wirichaga and Tim Faras, both high shooters in their classes. Remember nearly everyone has a .308 or .30-06 hunting rifle at home and can compete in this match on the first Sunday each month. You'll need 50 rounds of ammo with 40 rounds for score. 10 on each steel target from the off-hand standing position. Contact Rifle director Ron A Calderone evenings at 885-0764 for more details.

§          Small-bore Rifle Silhouette

§          No match in May due to HPRS Championships.

Sahuaro 1000 yds. BR

Shooter                                  Group     Score

*Denotes Small Group Relay Winner

**Denotes High Score winner

SAHUARO 1000yds. B/R May 11 2003

Shooter                                 Score      Group

Jim Musegades                    18”          50

Clyde Weckworth                14 ½”*   88#

Don Bennett                         22 3/8”    54

Gene Hudspeth                    24 7/8”    55

Chris Hudspeth                    17 ½”*   54

Mike Chapdelain                  35            72

§         Small Group Shoot-Off

Clyde Weckworth  18 1/8”

Chris Hudspeth       23 7/8”

#Denotes High Score Winner

*Denotes Small Grp Relay winner

Tucson Rifle Club John C. Garand Match Bulletin

18 May 03 7:30 am; Current CMP Competition Rules, Garand Match-Course B.

Rifles Used: M1 Rifle – 11; M1903 – 1; M1903A3 – 1; AR-15 – 5; Mosin-Nagant M-44 – 2; Mauser K-98 – 1; SKS – 1; NRA Match Rifle - 2

Fourteen competitors purchased .30-06 club ammunition.  All others furnished their own ammunition.  # Competitors: 24

Match Results:

1.       Pete Wolf                       483-17X (NRA Match Rifle)

2.       Rick Smart                    482-19X (AR-15)

3.       Dan Rodriguez             478-16X (AR-15)

4.       Bob Pirisky                    471-13X (AR-15)

5.       Robert Suomala 461-4X (M1903A3) Match Winner

6.       Shawn Hermann         449-3X (AR-15)

7.       Brian Lukow                 436-6X (AR-15)

8.       Randy Dwornik            423-3X Garand High Score

9.       Neal Hogan 409-2X (Garand)

10.     Robert Hedin               403-0X (Garand)

11.    Joey Laidson                383-1X (NRA Match Rifle)

12.    Charles Edington        382-3X (Garand)

13.    Ron Mendex                 367-0X (Garand)

14.    Emil Yerhart 346-1X (Garand)

15.    Maury Krupp                 340-2X (M1903)

16.    Jonathan Deatmond 335-1X (Garand)

17.    Mark Trombley             315-0X (Garand)

18.    Tom Monahan              307-0X (Garand)

19.    Rusty Hammer            292-0X (Mosin-Nagant M-44)

20.    Greg Fallon   282-4X (Garand) (prone only)

21.    Ben White                     243-2X (Mosin-Nagant M-44)

22.    Dennis Ragsdale        230-1X (SKS)

23.    Christopher Stillson 176-0X (Garand)

24.    Rolly Cooper                121-0X (K-98 Mauser)

Roy Dunlap 800-Aggregate High Power Rifle:

Match Course: 80-shot Regional Course.  24 May 2003

Match Course: 80-shot Regional Course, Service Rifle and NRA Match Rifle.  SR target at 200yd, SR-3 at 300yd, MR-1 at 600yd.

Number of Competitors: 14 (5 NRA, 9 Non-NRA)

Phil Hayes            770-14X  Non-NRA Service Rifle Winner

Tom Albanito                        764-18X

Bill Poole                               755-12X

Brian Hubbard     735-15X*  NRA Service Rifle Expert Winner

Jim Denovchek                    733-10X

John Kuhns                          727-12X

Pete Wolf                               701-7X*

Bob Pirisky                            685-3X*

Dan Rodriguez                     673-11X*

Bill Hardy                               655-2X

Emil Yerhart                          651-4X

John Schmitz                        646-8X*

Maury Krupp                         625-2X

Randy Dwornik                    581-2X

§         You thought only pickups had gun-racks:

Commuters heading for the International Space Station aboard Soyuz spacecraft will find a work tool they might not expect: a sawed-off shotgun.

The Associated Press reports that nobody leaves home in a Russian space capsule without a shotgun on board.

Unlike American spacecraft, which plopped in the ocean before shuttles began landing on runways, Russian craft returned to Earth on land.  In 1965, according to AP, two cosmonauts overshot their touchdown site by 2,000 miles and found themselves deep in a forest with hungry wolves.  Nobody was eaten, but since then the Russian space officials have made sure that every crew was packing heat.  When two Americans and a Russian returned from the ISS aboard a Soyuz craft in May they landed 300 miles off course in the steppes of Kazakhstan and waited four hours to be retrieved.  Nonetheless, said astronaut Kenneth Bowersox, they didn’t need the gun. “There was nothing out there but grass and us,” he said.

=          =          =          =          =          =          =

·         The Framers of the Constitution didn't establish our freedoms simply by decreeing them into existence. They didn't issue edicts within the four corners of that document guaranteeing that Americans would be entitled to a certain list of freedoms. That prose wouldn't have been worth the parchment it was written on.

They invested the federal government with sufficient powers to enable it to perform its essential functions and reserved the remainder to the states and the people. But they knew you couldn't achieve liberty through these affirmative grants (or reservations) of power alone. They also imposed limitations on governmental power because unchecked governmental power destroys liberty, which brings us to the doctrines of federalism, separation of power and judicial activism.

   With federalism they divided power between the federal and state governments. With the separation of powers, they diffused the power of the federal government among three distinct, but interactive branches — each checking the others against becoming too powerful. (The Bill of Rights and other constitutional amendments contain other limitations.)

   To preserve our constitutional scheme of liberties, it is imperative that federalism and the separation of powers be taken seriously. That means the federal government shouldn't act outside its express and implied powers. And it means each branch of government must operate within its own sphere. The legislative makes laws; the executive enforces them; and the judiciary interprets them.

   Each time the federal government usurps power intended for the states our freedoms erode. Each time one branch assumes a function of another, our freedoms erode.

   One of the primary functions of the federal judiciary has been to prevent the other two branches from acting beyond their constitutional authority. It was also intended to prevent federal encroachments on states' rights, in other words, to honor the federalism doctrine. Only in recent years has the court begun to resume that important duty.

   The judiciary, however, was designed to be a passive branch, deciding legal disputes (cases and controversies) among people and interpreting the laws, including the Constitution, not making the laws or creating new constitutional rights, such as privacy. Judicial activism occurs when the judiciary makes rather than interprets laws.

   So it was wholly proper (and not judicial activism) for the Supreme Court to bar federal suits by state employees against their employers under the Americans with Disabilities Act when the 11th Amendment to the Constitution forbids such suits. It would have been improper judicial activism for the court to permit such suits just because a majority of the judges happened to believe it was a desirable policy.

   To the liberals, conservative judicial activism is when the courts refuse to implement liberal policy, even when doing so would be outside their constitutional authority. It's kind of like the Soviet communists defining imperialism as the actions of any foreign power standing in the way of Soviet territorial expansion.

=          =          =          =          =          =          =

     In Democracy by Decree, recently published by Yale University Press, New York Law School professors Ross Sandler and David Schoenbrod show how the plaintiff's bar and judges have used consent decrees to take government away from elected officials. Two recent books by the Manhattan Institute's Walter K. Olson and the National Rifle Association's Wayne LaPierre show how class action lawyers are trying to use the courts to take away our constitutional rights.

     In The Rule of Lawyers (St. Martin's Press, 2003), Olson describes how left-wing gun control fanatics used wealthy class action lawyers and private foundations in an effort to destroy U.S. gun manufacturers. The lawyers invented new concepts of liability and blamed gun manufacturers for the misuse of guns by individuals.

     Olson notes that the twisted argument of the suits would hold match companies responsible for the actions of arsonists.

     The suits, of course, were not designed to win a legal point, but to bankrupt gun manufacturers, many of which are small and family owned, with legal fees defending against many separate lawsuits filed in behalf of many cities. The goal of the lawsuits was a settlement that would create a five-member politically unaccountable "commission" to take over the gun industry.

     Olson notes the irony of cities, which routinely sell thousands of used police weapons on the gun market, fronting for lawsuits against gun manufacturers for selling their wares to federally licensed dealers. Olson exposes the dishonesty of representing anti-gun billionaires, such as George Soros, and billionaire class action lawyers, whose trophy investments include sports teams, as "underdogs" in their onslaught against small, thinly financed family-owned gun manufacturers.

     Gullible Americans are not rare. All that is required for a small wealthy elite to destroy the Second Amendment is a gullible jury and a judge who permits a class action suit to expropriate the powers of legislators.

     Wealthy gun control fanatics are in the forefront of the powerful lobbies determined to block any tort reform that would prevent private groups from assuming the powers of lawmakers. In Guns, Freedom and Terrorism, Wayne LaPierre describes the attempt underway to destroy the concept of personal responsibility and to hold innocent third parties liable for criminal acts.

     We might think this can never happen in America, but LaPierre's report in the May 2003 American Rifleman shows that victims of criminals are now held responsible for the actions of the criminals who victimized them.

     In 1992, two teen-age males stole three handguns from a gun show. Next, the teen-agers went on a rampage breaking into cars. Stealing one, they amused themselves by sliding it into garbage cans. When they lost control and crashed, the person who approached the car to see if they were injured was shot twice for his compassion.

     A normal person might think it is clear enough that the teen-agers themselves are responsible for their crime spree. However, in 1996 an Ohio court decided that it was the gun show promoter!

     In 2002, Kristen Rand of the Violence Policy Center, an anti-gun group, told the House Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection that tort reform would interfere with the ability to hold innocent people responsible for the actions of criminals. It is important for the American people, she claimed, for decisions such as the Ohio one to flourish.

     New York's Sullivan Act, the original gun control law, was passed in response to the criminal lobby in New York's Red Hook district. Robbers objected to the right of their intended victims to carry concealed weapons and succeeded in getting the right outlawed.

     It is equally clear today that criminals are the only beneficiary of gun control laws. In his book LaPierre documents the results of Great Britain's total ban on handguns, rifles, pump-action and semi-automatic shotguns. Violent crime in Britain has exploded. A disarmed public is at the mercy of well-armed thugs. The British people are robbed, raped and murdered in their homes and offices, on their streets, and in their subways and public parks.

     The British experience proves beyond any shadow of doubt the truth of the NRA's point: "When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns."

=          =          =          =          =          =          =

·         Another lesson learned the hard way OR Always be careful what you ask for, you just may get it.

One of the many headaches that George W. Bush inherited from his predecessor was the Puerto Rican Island of Vieques. In the waning years of the Clinton administration, protesters demanded that the U.S. Navy abandon bombing and naval gun fire exercises that had taken place on the largely uninhabited island for nearly seventy years. It became a leftist cause. Liberal icons bumped into one another to fly to Puerto Rico, boat over to the island, trespass (but never on a day that there was an exercise scheduled) and get arrested for the benefit of the New York Times or Newsweek. They included the Reverend Al Sharpton, Mrs. Jesse Jackson, Joan Baez, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Edward Olmos, Michael Moore, and Ramsey Clark, just to name a few.

Hillary Clinton, then running for the U.S. Senate in New York, chastised the U.S. Navy for not bowing to the "will of the citizens of Puerto Rico," until her husband, a week before the election, issued an executive order to phase out the facility by 2003, despite  recommendations to the contrary by his own Secretary of Defense and the Chief of Naval Operations.

   In 2002, the bombing exercises were transferred to an Air Force bombing range in central Florida, not far from the Jacksonville and Pensacola Naval Air Stations. In January, many of the protesters were back in Puerto Rico, celebrating the final bombing exercise on Vieques and waved Puerto Rican flags and placards that read "U.S. Navy, get out of Puerto Rico." On February 21, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld announced that the U.S. Navy will close the Roosevelt Roads Naval Air Station in Puerto Rico in 2004, eliminating 1200 civilian jobs as well as 700 military positions. This naval facility is estimated to put nearly $300 million annually into the local economy.

   The next day a stunned Governor Sila Calderon, held a news conference in San Juan, protesting the base closure as a serious blow to Commonwealth's fragile economy. The governor stated that "The people of Puerto Rico don't now or never did have an interest in closing the Vieques bombing range or the Roosevelt Roads naval base. My government is interested in both staying in Puerto Rico."

   When asked, Admiral Robert J. Natter, Commander-in Chief, Western Atlantic Command, said, "Without Vieques, I see no further need for the facility at Roosevelt Roads. None."

   So, Yanqui go home? Fine.. But we'll take our dollars with us. Hasta la vista, baby!

... and then, this:

On February 21, the Secretary of Defense announced that starting this year, the U.S. European Command would begin moving most if not all of its active combat and support units from bases in Germany to others being established in Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Turkey to "better position them for rapid deployment to likely hot spots in those parts of the world".

   Immediately the business and government leaders in the German states of Hesse, Rhineland, and Wurttemburg protested the loss of nearly $6 billion in revenue each year from the bases and manpower to be displaced. A spokesman for the Foreign Ministry speculated that the move may be "what the Americans call 'payback' for the actions of this government in opposing military action in Iraq."

=          =          =          =          =          =          =         

Anatomy of the Three-Week War

(It was more that we were good rather than they were bad.)

     In the aftermath of the incredible three-and-a-half week victory we should not post facto make the mistake of assuming that Operation Iraqi Freedom was necessarily an easy task.

     The Soviets learned that trying to take an Islamic city is not an easy thing and can lead to thousands of dead and hundreds of lost tanks, planes, and armored vehicles. More Americans were killed in Lebanon in a single day than all those lost in the present campaign. In 1991 six weeks were necessary to soften up Iraqi troops — along with nearly a million allied soldiers. The British learned that attempting an invasion of the Dardanelles against a supposedly "weak" Turkey led to a bloodbath.

     A fair historical assessment will soon emerge that attributes our victory not to Iraqi weaknesses per se. Rather it was the American ability on the ground and air in a matter of hours to decapitate the command-and-control apparatus of the Baathist regime that alone allowed bridges, oil wells, power plants, and harbors to be saved, and chemical weapons not to be used.

     There were a number of inherent — indeed deadly — risks in the operation. Much is made of having few troops on the ground. But a greater worry was the need to deploy from the rather narrow staging area in Kuwait, once access was denied in Turkey and Saudi Arabia. Assembling 300,000-400,000 ground-combat troops in such a small area over such a long period of time in essence would have left half the available aggregate land forces of the United States vulnerable in a few thousand square acres to missile or chemical attacks. And such a Gulf War I-type mobilization — given the deep cuts of the 1990s — would have left the U.S. army scarcely able to have met a sudden attack from North Korea.

     Another problem was the geography of Iraq itself. Ostensibly it is a wide country with few obstructions. In fact, the actual inhabited areas resemble Egypt more than France, in that almost all the population centers and roads to Baghdad are concentrated in the narrow Tigris-Euphrates corridor, land that is marshier than desert, where dozens of bridges span tributaries and wetlands. In short, it was not an easy task to drive 400-500 miles northward to Kurdistan from a single base in a long, narrow thrust that could be stalled by a few carefully blown bridges and mined highways.

     The nature of the population — not quite hostile like the Japanese of 1945, not quite friendly as the Western Europeans of 1944 — posed even greater challenges. Like Italy of 1943, occupation and liberation were sometimes fuzzy concepts that affected the degree of force required: Stop Baathist control, but don't destroy infrastructure; kill Republican Guardsmen, but not those who might defect.

     It was almost as if we were trying to exorcise a demon from an innocent zombie host, and thus had to use enough shock to chase out the spirit without damaging the body. That paradox in and of itself meant that a long preliminary bombing campaign was politically impossible — especially with the world's news agencies ensconced in the Palestine Hotel paying bribe money to Baathists for the privilege of sending out slanted and censored news about collateral damage.

     How then did we do it, and do it without the typical Serbia or Afghanistan preliminary bombardment? It was not just that we had air superiority and 70 percent of the ordnance dropped was "smart." Rather the bombs were "brilliant" in that they were so accurate that they could target individual headquarters, houses, even artillery pieces, tanks, buses, and trucks. Most Republican Guard divisions were not 50 percent disabled by air attacks, but more likely reduced to only 20 percent of their original combat efficiency. When 1,000 Coalition planes were in the sky, coupled with Army Apache and Black Hawk helicopters, and thousands of munitions often directed to precise locations by ground spotters, infantry obtained the auxiliary power of several traditional armored divisions.

     But it would be a mistake to suggest that the army is somehow passé. Indeed, Iraqi Freedom has done more than anything in recent memory to enhance the reputation of land forces — 101st and 82nd Airborne, special forces, 3rd Mechanized Infantry — as they organized an entire front, parachuted in the darkness, fought house-to-house, and rolled like Patton to Baghdad. Thus it was precisely the liberation of the Army from its traditional roles that has made it even more vital to our national defense.

     More importantly still, the old idea of separate branches of the military is itself becoming obsolete. It is not just that there are Army, Marine, and Navy pilots or that Seals and Air Force controllers fight on land. Rather there is such instantaneous integration between land, air, and sea forces that it is hard to sort out who is doing what when enemy tanks explode out of nowhere, GPS-guided bombs go into the windows of Baathists, and special — forces hit teams take out generals before they can order counterassaults.

     This joint operational approach is similar to the evolution of the heavy classical Greek phalanx into the multifaceted army of Philip II, when hoplites transmogrified into lighter-but-deadlier phalangites, who in turn were enhanced by a symphony of forces — light and heavy cavalry, hypaspists, light infantry, slingers, archers, and missile troops. By allowing a variety of forces (the hammers) to drive enemies into his phalanx (the anvil), Alexander made his spearmen far deadlier than their classical infantry predecessors who had once exercised exclusive control of the battlefield.

     But the lethality of the military is not just organizational or a dividend of high-technology. Moral and group cohesion explain more still. The general critique of the 1990s was that we had raised a generation with peroxide hair and tongue rings, general illiterates who lounged at malls, occasionally muttering "like" and "you know" in Sean Penn or Valley Girl cadences. But somehow the military has married the familiarity and dynamism of crass popular culture to 19th-century notions of heroism, self-sacrifice, patriotism, and audacity.

     The result is that the energy of our soldiers arises from the ranks rather than is imposed from above. What, after all, is the world to make of Marines shooting their way into Baathist houses with Ray-Bans sunglasses, or shaggy special forces who look like they are strolling in Greenwich Village with M-16s, or tankers with music blaring and logos like "Bad Moon Rising?" The troops look sometimes like cynical American teenagers but they fight and die like Leathernecks on Okinawa.

     The Arab street may put on shows of goose-stepping suicide bombers, noisy pajama-clad killers, and shrill, masked assassins, but in real battle against gum-chewing American adolescents with sunglasses these street toughs prove to be little more than toy soldiers.

     By the same token, officers talk and act like a mixture of college professors and professional boxers. Ram-rod straight they brave fire alongside their troops — seconds later to give brief interviews about the intricacies of tactics and the psychology of civilian onlookers. Somehow the military inculcated among its officer corps the truth that education and learning were not antithetical to risking one's life at the front; a strange sight was an interview with a young officer offering greetings to his fellow alumni — of Harvard Business School. 

     So besides a new organization and new technologies, there is a new soldier of sorts as well.

Are there any preliminary lessons from the three-week warring from which we can learn?

     Helicopters are, of course, vital for fast-moving airborne operations, but when they go down with critical special-forces operatives or a half-dozen soldiers the losses are more than material, but are grievous in a psychological sense as well. The public can accept soldiers who fall in battle, but are traumatized when they die in groups of three, four, six, or seven from mechanical failure rather than enemy fire. We need clearly to invest in a new generation of transport, stressing good old-fashioned backup systems and reliability over enhanced speed and high technology. Tankers, transport, and other logistical craft — what Cicero would probably now call the sinews of war — deserve more investment and concern.

     It is becoming a truism that friendly fire is an inescapable part of modern warfare that can account for almost 20 percent and more of all battlefield fatalities. There is a strange new law emerging: that the degree of high technology needed to ensure almost no losses from enemy action is almost commensurate with increased accidental injury. But like helicopter crashes, friendly fire sends ripples of trauma beyond the actual number of dead and tends to erode morale and support.

     War is becoming so fast and so lethal that each hour hundreds of 22-year-olds now hold the lives and deaths of dozens in their thumbs' millisecond decisions to squeeze buttons. Indeed, the quicker and more effective our troops become, the more likely they are to overrun enemy positions, leapfrog over projected objectives, and achieve almost immediate air superiority — thus confusing battle lines and putting them on collision courses with each other.

     The United States military is now evolving geometrically as it gains experience from near-constant fighting and grafts new technology daily. Indeed, it seems to be doubling, tripling, and even quadrupling its lethality every few years. And the result is that we are outdistancing not merely the capabilities of our enemies but our allies as well — many of whom who have not fought in decades — at such a dizzying pace that our sheer destructive power makes it hard to work with others in joint operations. In that context, we might reassess the need to take technology to its theoretical -nth degree: How many new sophisticated stealthy $1.5 billion bombers do we need, when the equivalent expenditure would pay for a more mundane but vital mechanized Division for an entire year?

     Such unprecedented military power brings with it enormous moral responsibility as the world — its utopians especially — in the decades ahead will vie for a hand in the decisions on how to use it and for what purposes. There quite literally has never been a single nation that has exercised such colossal military force to change almost instantly the status quo, and used it under the auspices of a consensual government to free — Grenada, Panama, Serbia, Afghanistan, and Iraq — rather than to enslave peoples.

     How long it will last, we do not know, but we should at least realize that we are living in one of the most anomalous periods in recorded history.

     Sophocles would warn us that hubris — not enemies in the here and now — is the only real danger to us on the horizon. But so far we have avoided the gods' nemeses precisely because our soldiers have put their power in the service of good by toppling odious despots — Noriega, Milosevic, Mullah Omar, Saddam Hussein — and leaving the seeds of freedom in their wake. We of an often cynical and ironic society at the least owe them a commensurate idealism.

     At one time in my life, I thought I had a handle on the meaning of the word "service".   The act of doing things for other people.  Then I heard the terms:

Internal Revenue Service; Postal Service; Civil Service; Service Stations; Customer Service; City/County Public Service.  And I became confused about the word "service."  This is not what I thought "service" meant.

    Then one day, I overheard two farmers talking, and one of

them mentioned that he was having a bull service a few of his cows.  It all came into perspective.   Now I understand what all those "service" agencies are doing to us.

-           -           -           -           -           -           -

§         Speaking of small weapons …

New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, when he's not busy issuing gun-control decrees, travels with an armed bodyguard.  What's more, in the wake of the Bush administration's apparent disconnect with its conservative base over the Feinstein-Schumer Gun-Control Act, Sen. Frank Lautenberg has vowed to block a Senate bill shielding gun makers and dealers from lawsuits (another method Leftist gun-confiscators are using to litigate the Second Amendment into oblivion), planning a filibuster to prevent the bill from reaching the President's desk.  "I will do all I can to block it," he said. "It is an unconscionable piece of legislation."

   Lautenberg is also proposing a "Homeland Security Gun Safety Act," creating a national gun registry, in violation of the Constitution's Second Amendment, arguing, "As our government confiscates toenail scissors at airports, secures power plants, and increases domestic surveillance, we're ignoring the most obvious threat that's out there, and that is the ease in which terrorists can access weapons in virtually any town across the country."  (Lautenberg conveniently forgets that the most heinous terrorist attack on U.S. soil -- 9-11 -- was not perpetrated with firearms.)

  • Food for Thought

Give a person a fish and you feed them for a day; teach that person to use the Internet and they won't bother you for weeks.

   Some people are like Slinkies...not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs.

   I read recipes the same way I read science fiction.  I get to the end and I think, "Well, that's not going to happen."

·          Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, lying in hospitals dying of nothing.

   The other night I ate at a real family restaurant.  Every table had an argument going.

   Have you noticed since everyone has a camcorder these days no one talks about seeing UFOs like they used to?

   According to a recent survey, men say the first thing they notice about a woman is their eyes, and women say the first thing they notice about men is they're a bunch of liars.

·          Whenever I feel blue, I start breathing again.

   All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism.

   Have you noticed that a slight tax increase costs you two hundred dollars and a substantial tax cut saves you thirty cents?

   In the 60's people took acid to make the world weird. Now the world is weird and people take Prozac to make it normal.

   Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first.

   There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened.

   How is it, one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire? (And I can't get anything happening in my hibachi without aviation fuel and a flame thrower)

   You read about all these terrorists--most of them came here legally, but they hung around on expired visas, some for as long as 10-15 years.  Now, compare that to Blockbuster: you're one day late with a video and those people are all over you. Let's put Blockbuster in charge of immigration.

·         Drug Problem

I had a drug problem when I was young.

I was drug to church on Sunday morning,

I was drug to church for weddings and funerals.

I was drug to family reunions no matter the weather.

I was drug to the bus stop to go to school every weekday.

I was drug by my ears when disrespectful to adults and teachers.

I was also drug to the woodshed when I disobeyed my parents.

Those drugs are still in my veins; and they affect my behavior in everything I do, say, and think. They are stronger than cocaine, crack, or heroin, and if today's children had this kind of drug problem, America would certainly be a better place.

 

Stupid Gun Laws – the 1994 “Assault Weapon” and magazine ban nonsense is set to ‘Sundown’ in September 2004)  I don’t know about you but I’m tired of having to pay $50 for a $10 magazine.  And they DO wear out, break or get damaged after a time of use.

     Though House Majority Leader Tom DeLay says "The votes in the House are not there" to renew the measure, Feinstein and Schumer just introduced a bill in the Senate to renew the law, and they will press the House for a roll call vote in the upcoming election year.

    Unfortunately, President Bush has reiterated that he SUPPORTS the gun-ban -- an affront to the Constitutional right of all law abiding citizens to own semi-automatic sporting rifles for lawful purposes.  Feinstein and Schumer even applauded President Bush, saying: "We welcome your support and look forward to working with you to gain swift passage of this legislation.  With your assistance, we will be able to pass legislation to continue the

ban and help make America's streets safer."

     "Safer"? For whom?  Such laws claim, ostensibly, to protect law-abiding citizens.  Of course, only law-abiding citizens comply with these restrictions -- and at their own peril.  Criminals don't care if the weapon they are using comport with the 23,000 federal, state and local gun restrictions already on the books.

   The Democrat's "incremental encroachment" on the Second Amendment is a thinly-veiled strategy to achieve their ultimate goal of gun confiscation, as Ms. Feinstein made clear after passage of her 1994 legislation: "If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate...for an outright ban, picking up every one of them, Mr. and Mrs. America, turn them all in, I would have done it!"

 

"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them." --Justice Joseph Story appointed to the Supreme Court by James Madison, author of our Constitution.

 

"If a nation expects to be ignorant -- and free -- in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be." --Thomas Jefferson

·         Democrats held a presidential debate in Iowa in front of a union crowd. It was quite a show. The candidates spent ninety minutes discussing ways to prevent corporations from making profits so we can get this economy moving again.

"The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself." --John Stuart Mills

 

"Around the world we've seen how government can be perverted into an instrument of kleptocracy. ... 'Kleptocracy' is not too strong a word if you believe our tort system should be a means of compensating the truly wronged and not a means of transferring large amounts of wealth to those who are adept at manipulating the levers. ... We've reached the point where the Democrat Party's captivity [to the trial lawyers] has become an embarrassment and threat to the nation." --Wall Street Journal

 

"Well I like to do my own research so I think what I would say is that we haven't found Saddam Hussein and I don't know anyone who's running around saying he didn't exist. It takes time. Does that sound reasonable?"

 

Saddam Hussein remained invisible ... after he made his weapons of mass destruction vanish into thin air. This man is just a white tiger away from having a job for life on the Las Vegas stage. We already know he can saw a woman in half.

   Israeli leader Ariel Sharon and Palestine leader Mahmoud Abbas shook hands on President Bush's peace plan.  What a major historic moment. It barely made the evening newscast because back in the United States all Hillary broke loose.  Hillary Clinton told reporters ... she's too busy being a U.S. senator to run for president.  Sure. Being a senator requires no talent.  Every fifteen minutes, someone gets up to speak and says nothing, nobody listens, then everybody disagrees.

   Sharon Stone may play Hillary Clinton in a movie based on the book Hillary's Choice. It's an unauthorized biography. Bill Clinton let it be known through his office spokesman that if Sharon Stone plays his wife, he would like to play himself.

 

“Big government is the most corrupt industry in America.”

  Malcom Wallop

 

I’m done for now, thank you for your indulgence and I’ll see you at the Range.                       Jamesbertrand@msn.com

 

It with sadness that we at TRC receive news that pistol silhouette competitor and friend of the Club, Tim Cooper has passed away.  He succumbed to the aggression of a cranial tumor from which (post surgery) he could not recover.  Tim was instrumental in helping collect and maintain our ‘fleet’ of golf carts that are used by the range personnel in their duties of moving around for day-to-day operations.  We offer our prayers to those close to Tim and his family.  Another very nice man is gone.  May he rest in peace.